Archive for the ‘climate science’ Category

Climate Clues

September 29, 2010

Geologist Professor Don J. Easterbrook makes a prediction for the world’s climate out to 2100

In his prediction, the next cool phase bottoms out around 2040 and the following warm phase tops out around 2080 with temperatures higher than currently experienced.

A cold climate would have a severe impact on the worlds ability to grow crops and feed itself with some areas hit harder than others. In Revelation 6:8 we have this prediction:

8And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.

A hot climate would result in scorching temperatures. In Revelation 8:7 we have this prediction:

7The first angel sounded, and there followed hail and fire mingled with blood, and they were cast upon the earth: and the third part of trees was burnt up, and all green grass was burnt up.

The conditions in the first biblical prediction are experienced by man-kind in general no matter what his or her affiliation i.e. normal climate. In the intervening time between the two biblical predictions the Christian church is taken out of the Earth and the conditions of the second prediction will be experienced by those remaining and especially by those who have taken the mark of the beast

Climate Wars

September 29, 2010

The EU is moving to ban air flights from landing unless the airlines engage in carbon trading. These headlines from climate change skeptic sites highlight the dictatorial aspect of the move:

Climate Wars: EU Threatens Rest Of The World With Flight Ban

Cancel all your European travel and vacation plans – carbon trading extortion is here

Revelation 13 describes a dictatorial governmental beast and the people ask the question in verse 4;

Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?

The definition of the Greek word for war translated here is:

  1. to war, carry on war
  2. to fight

This indicates from definition 2. that the people are powerless to overturn a pronouncement such as the EU flight ban proposal that imposes EU law on foreign entities.

Let’s see how this turns out.

Update 1.

Brussels has broken our power to rule

Update 2.

Aviation deal clears way for emissions scheme: EU

“The ETS is the EU’s main tool for combating climate change and it wants to see the system adopted worldwide”

Update 3.

UN goal set for capping aviation emissions – endorses EU scheme

“ICAO the first UN agency to lead a sector in “a globally harmonised agreement for addressing its CO2 emissions”.”

The Totalitarians

September 19, 2010

What is at the root of stories such as this proposal by the mad-science fringe to save the planet by……polluting the planet?

From WUWT http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/09/16/another-aerosol-injection-plan/

“Scientists at the Carnegie Institution’s Department of Global Ecology have taken a new approach on examining a proposal to fix the warming planet. So-called geo-engineering ideas—large-scale projects to change the Earth’s climate—have included erecting giant mirrors in space to reflect solar radiation, injecting aerosols of sulfate into the stratosphere making a global sunshade,,,,,,,,,,,,,,”

Of course they use the CO2-distorted global climate models to justify their “experiment”:

“The Carnegie scientists ran five simulations using a global climate model with different sulfate aerosol concentrations depending on latitude. They then used the results from these simulations in an optimization model to determine what distribution of sulfates would come closest to achieving specified climate goals. They then tested these distributions in the global climate model to assess how well the climate goals were met”

The first comment at WUWT says it all (apart from the sinister eugenic connotations):

Andres Valencia says:
September 16, 2010 at 9:31 pm

Is this for real?
First, models substitute experiments, now models substitute common sense!
Precautions?
Please keep it virtual, yes?

And the model outputs are based on model input assumptions. Fourth WUWT comment:

Mike Ford says:
September 16, 2010 at 9:43 pm

I got lost in the 3rd paragraph. The output of model 1 is the input to model 2. The output of model 2 is the input to model 3. This is science??????

Except that the initial model 1 input assumptions do not replicate the climate drivers active over the last 200 years; they only assume that ACO2 is the major climate driver so they cannot even replicate the current observed condition. If they did incorporate the natural cycles – solar (not the Judith Lean version), 60 year, Milankovitch etc they might be able to take a stab at the next seasons weather and the Global Warming, sorry, “Global Climate Disruption” problem will have blown away in the last spring storm.

Dots have already been joined. From Prison Planet:

“However, when you consider the fact that the global warming mantra is a thin veil for eugenics and population control, it’s unlikely that the world’s elite care about one third of the planet’s population being unable to eat, in fact they would probably see that as a bonus.

The known facts about what happens when the environment is loaded with sulphur dioxide are bad enough, since the compound is the main component of acid rain, which according to the EPA “Causes acidification of lakes and streams and contributes to the damage of trees at high elevations (for example, red spruce trees above 2,000 feet) and many sensitive forest soils. In addition, acid rain accelerates the decay of building materials and paints, including irreplaceable buildings, statues, and sculptures that are part of our nation’s cultural heritage.”

The health effects of bombarding the skies with sulphur dioxide alone are enough to mothball taxpayer funded research into the idea.

The following health effects are linked with exposure to sulphur.

– Neurological effects and behavioral changes
– Disturbance of blood circulation
– Heart damage
– Effects on eyes and eyesight
– Reproductive failure
– Damage to immune systems
– Stomach and gastrointestinal disorder
– Damage to liver and kidney functions
– Hearing defects
– Disturbance of the hormonal metabolism
– Dermatological effects
– Suffocation and lung embolism

According to the LennTech website, “Laboratory tests with test animals have indicated that sulfur can cause serious vascular damage in veins of the brains, the heart and the kidneys. These tests have also indicated that certain forms of sulfur can cause foetal damage and congenital effects. Mothers can even carry sulfur poisoning over to their children through mother milk. Finally, sulfur can damage the internal enzyme systems of animals.”

Fred Singer, president of the Science Environmental Policy Project and a skeptic of man-made global warming theories, warns that the consequences of tinkering with the planet’s delicate eco-system could have far-reaching dangers.

“If you do this on a continuous basis, you would depress the ozone layer and cause all kinds of other problems that people would rather avoid,” said Singer.

Even Greenpeace’s chief UK scientist – a staunch advocate of the man-made global warming explanation – Doug Parr – has slammed attempts to geo-engineer the planet as “outlandish” and “dangerous”..

http://www.prisonplanet.com/geo-engineering-killing-off-the-useless-eaters.html

So, where does the Carnegie Institution’s Department of Global Ecology get their funding?

Follow the money for the answer – the Carnegie Endowment
http://www.carnegieendowment.org/about/index.cfm?fa=funding

The Rockefeller Brothers contribute via Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Rockefeller Financial Services and The Rockefeller Foundation.

And what does David Rockefeller believe?

“The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

We also have US President Obama’s “science” czar John P. Holdren wanting to “de-develop” the United States:

http://climatechangedispatch.com/enviro-extremists/7687-white-house-science-czar-says-he-would-use-free-market-to-de-develop-the-united-states

The totalitarians aspirations have not gone unnoticed by man-made climate change skeptics:

http://joannenova.com.au/2010/09/un-totalitarians-want-your-money-and-your-life/

http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2010/09/09/un-plans-expanding-influence-on-world-agenda/

But the root of this totalitarianism is arch totalitarian – Satan. The dragon that gives power to the governmental beast of Revelation 13.

2And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.

3And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.

4And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?

The worship hasn’t started yet but the power is being flexed.

Update 1

Internet free speech under threat by totalitarians (including the UN)

Australian Greens move to legislate euthanasia

The UN Plan for Global Control

Update 2

Global Warming Alarmist Calls For Eco-Gulags To Re-Educate Climate Deniers

Update  3

Global Tax Scam Shifts From Climate Change To Poverty

Update 4

Hamilton and the green totalitarians

Update 5

The EU is an antidote to democratic governments, argues President Barroso

James Lovelock: We need a more authoritative world. It may be necessary to put democracy on hold for a while

Update 6

The totalitarian eco-fascist dark side of Greens (funded by the UK Govt.)

Update 7.

Green Supremacists, An environmentalist fantasy of violent totalitarianism.

Backlash Part ll, 10:10’s massive PR fail